ArticlePeerJ2026
Persistent genetic connectivity in caribou may buffer against inbreeding effects.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Mulchatna Caribou Herd (MCH) in southwest Alaska has undergone significant demographic fluctuations, with a 94% decline over the past three decades, reducing the population from an estimated 200,000 to 13,000 individuals. This decline and concurrent range contraction, coupled with radio-telemetry and global positioning system (GPS)-collar studies, revealed indications of herd substructure. Females showed fidelity to one of two spatially distinct calving aggregations (designated as east and west), an attribute typically used to define individual herds in Alaska, and to three breeding areas within the greater MCH range (designated east, central, and west). To assess the genetic consequences of the population decline and apparent spatial substructuring, we analyzed genotyping-by-sequencing data from 121 adult female caribou. We found no strong genetic differentiation between east, central, and west subgroups, suggesting that the herd currently functions as a single genetic population despite observed spatial structuring during breeding and calving. In addition, we found no significant levels of inbreeding, likely due to the previously large population size. Overall, our results support the idea that the movement of the MCH is best characterized by a spatially structured but genetically cohesive population, in which connectivity between migratory and nonmigratory groups occurs over a large geographic range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.