Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836168›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Heavy metal concentrations in Chinese chicken eggs: insights from comparative study of urban and mining areas.

Xue Li, Yuchen An, Zhuhong Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xue Li *School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Yuchen An *Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Zhuhong WangSchool of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The consumption of eggs in China accounts for over 40% of global egg consumption. Since eggs are a crucial source of daily dietary protein, and are relatively accessible and affordable protein foods, the issue of their food safety needs to be taken seriously. Research in some countries has reported excessively high heavy metal levels in eggs from areas surrounding mining sites. However, the extent of heavy metal contamination in eggs from mining regions in China remains poorly understood. Methods: The concentrations of heavy metals (chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), selenium (Se), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb)) in eggs from five cities and three mining areas across China were determined by Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Subsequently, the metal concentration was used to evaluate the degree of heavy metal pollution in local eggs, while the estimated daily intake (EDI), target hazard quotient (THQ), hazard index (HI), and carcinogenic risk (CR) were applied to assess the potential health risks of egg consumption. Results: The results showed that there were significant differences in the concentrations of heavy metals in eggs from different regions, but the overall concentrations (

Indexed as

EggsFood ContaminationMetals, HeavyMiningAnimalsChickensChinaCitiesHumansMetals, HeavyCommercial eggsFree-range eggsHealth risk assessmentHeavy metal

Identifiers

PMID41836168
PMCPMC12988732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.