ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Exploratory Analysis of the Effect of Foot Deformities on Hindfoot Alignment Measurement: A Comparison of Second Ray, Ankle Mortise, and Forefoot Alignment on Weight-bearing CT.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate hindfoot alignment (HA) assessment is essential for surgical planning of foot and ankle procedures, as measurement errors may lead to inappropriate indication. Weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) enables HA assessment through coronal images, typically aligned perpendicular to the second ray. However, this forefoot-based reference may not be appropriate in all clinical scenarios, particularly when isolated hindfoot evaluation is required. This exploratory study sought to evaluate how 3 anatomical reference axes affect HA measurements in patients with different foot deformities. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined 136 WBCT and standard foot radiographs of patients older than 18 years. HA was measured as hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) in coronal images perpendicular to (1) second ray, (2) ankle mortise (bisection of medial and lateral malleoli), and (3) forefoot midpoint (bisection of first and fifth metatarsal heads). Meary, Sgarlato, hallux valgus, and intermetatarsal I-II and I-V angles assessed foot morphology. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess relationships between 2-dimensional (2D) parameters and HAA measurements. Results: Median age was 50.3 years and 64% were female. HAA showed significant variations across different reference systems (second ray: 10.0 degrees, ankle mortise: 15.2 degrees, forefoot midpoint: 12.7 degrees; Conclusions: Reference axis selection substantially influences 2D HA measurements on WBCT. The ankle mortise reference could provide isolated measurement of HA regardless of concurrent forefoot deformities. When using 2D measurement methods, reference system selection could be tailored to whether surgical planning requires comprehensive foot alignment assessment or isolated hindfoot evaluation. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.