ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2026
A protein-fragment complementation assay to quantify synthetic protein scaffold efficiency.
Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaffolds are powerful tools in synthetic biology used for various applications, from increasing yield to optimizing signalling specificity. Protein scaffolds can be built by fusing peptide binding domains (PBD) and attaching the peptide they bind to enzymes, inducing spatial proximity. Only a few PBD-peptide combinations have been tested in this context, and no combination produced a high yield in yeast, an important chassis in biotechnology. Therefore, there is a need for more exploration of PBD-peptide pairs to be used in this model. Scaffold characterization is challenging because it is often dependent on a model pathway with an output that is difficult to measure quantitatively. Here, we use the dihydrofolate reductase protein-fragment complementation assay (DHFR PCA) to study scaffolding efficiency in yeast, which allows to couple scaffolding efficiency with growth rate. First, we characterize the strength of PBD-peptide interactions (PPI) and the binding availability of the PBDs and peptides. Then, we test different scaffold architectures and expression levels to quantify the simultaneous binding of peptide pairs to the scaffold. We show that PPI strength of the weakest binding PBD-peptide pair is critical for scaffolding efficiency and that PPI strength is limited by low binding availability of some domains and peptides
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.