ArticleSAGE open medicine2026
Machine learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure using the Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the performance of different machine learning models in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of 229 patients were retrospectively reviewed for this study. The variables included age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney failure, Charlson comorbidity index, and length of hospital stay. In-hospital mortality ("in-hospital death") was defined as the dependent variable. The machine learning methods used included logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting, and multilayer perceptron models. The model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, precision-recall area under the curve, F1 score, and Brier score. Results: In-hospital mortality was observed in 7 of the 229 patients included in the study (3.1%). The mean age and frequency of chronic kidney disease were higher among deceased patients, whereas the Charlson comorbidity index did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors. In model comparisons, the Gradient Boosting model showed the best overall performance (ROC-AUC: 0.87, PR-AUC: 0.76, F1: 0.73; Brier score: 0.12). Conclusion: The Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the highest performance in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure. Machine learning algorithms offer strong potential beyond traditional statistical approaches for the prognostic prediction of complex clinical scenarios such as heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.