ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Development and Validation of an Electronic Health Record Algorithm to Predict the Presence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently diagnosed and treated based on clinical suspicion alone, without spirometric confirmation of expiratory airflow obstruction (AFO, defined by a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV Patients and Methods: Our analysis included 15,065 patients who underwent pulmonary function testing between 2016-2022. Patients were categorized as having AFO (n=4632) or not (n=10,433) based on spirometry. Patients < 45 years, with cystic fibrosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, or prior spirometric evidence of obstruction were excluded. Logistic regression assessed 65 variables, retaining those that optimized model discrimination. The data were randomly split into training (n=10,546) and validation (n=4519) sets. Results: Key predictors of AFO included older age, male sex, lower BMI, smoking history, prior COPD diagnosis, increased emergency department utilization, fewer outpatient visits, fewer chest X-rays, and higher cumulative beta-agonist prescriptions. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81-0.83) in the validation dataset and was well calibrated. Conclusion: We developed an EHR-based algorithm that accurately predicts AFO using routinely collected structured data. This tool provides a practical method for identifying patients for targeted COPD case finding. Future efforts will focus on external validation and integration into clinical workflows, enabling automated identification and provider or patient notification to facilitate appropriate pulmonary function testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.