ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Psychological Readiness in Elite Versus Nonelite Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychological readiness encompasses fear of reinjury, confidence in performance, and risk appraisal. It is increasingly recognized as a critical factor influencing return to play (RTP) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Elite athletes typically exhibit high self-efficacy and a strong athletic identity while also facing intense external pressure to return. While these dynamics undoubtedly influence their response to injury and psychological recovery after ACLR, the precise differences in psychological readiness between elite and nonelite athletes have not been reported. Purpose: To compare psychological readiness between elite and nonelite athletes after primary ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 756 participants were included in this study. There were 252 elite athletes and 504 propensity score-matched, nonelite athletes (1:2 ratio). Elite athletes were those who played professional sport, represented their country at international competitions, or played intercounty-level Gaelic Games. Psychological readiness was compared between groups preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively using the ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI). Participants were contacted at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively to record if they had returned to play. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors (eg, age, sex, elite level) associated with ACL-RSI scores at 9 months. Results: Preoperative ACL-RSI scores did not differ significantly between elite and nonelite groups (50.6 ± 27.4 vs 48.1 ± 26.6; Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that preoperative ACL-RSI scores were comparable between elite and nonelite athletes. However, elite athletes had consistently higher ACL-RSI scores during rehabilitation and ultimately greater RTP rates. Knee function and male sex are the strongest predictors of ACL-RSI score. Being an elite athlete is not a primary predictor of psychological readiness, and psychological intervention should be considered in all athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.