ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2026
Stopping an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST111 by temporarily blocking the siphon to disinfect it before the transition to the wastewater drain.
Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Resulting from an analysis of an outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Result: By temporarily blocking the drain before the transition to the wastewater drain with a balloon, it was possible to disinfect the traps without disassembly and stop the outbreak. Discussion: Temporarily blocking the drain can stop outbreaks originating from the siphon. However, this does not protect the siphon from renewed contamination by patients, or subsequent biofilm formation. Therefore, the only option in cases of known patient colonization or infection with critical multi-resistant pathogens that can colonize the siphon is to disinfect the siphon after the patient's discharge by temporarily blocking it. Since even non-resistant wastewater bacteria can cause infections, especially in immunocompromised patients, an option for obviating this problem would be to dispense with washbasins in high-risk areas such as units for intensive care, burns, cystic fibrosis and neonatology. As a general rule, water used to wash patients in bed must be disposed of in separate drains outside the patient's room. Since self-disinfecting siphons significantly reduce emissions from the siphon, combined with lower colonization or infection of exposed patients; their installation in high-risk areas may be useful for reducing nosocomial infections. However, in the event of an outbreak of a multi-resistant pathogen with the ability to colonize the siphon, it is necessary take samples of siphons and, if detected, to disinfect them by temporarily blocking them. Conclusion: The option of disinfection of siphons by temporarily blocking them is a technically simple, economically immediate measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.