Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835935›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Toward automated neonatal EEG analysis: multi-center validation of a reliable deep learning pipeline.

Tim Hermans, Anneleen Dereymaeker, Katrien Lemmens, Katrien Jansen, Fatima Usman, Shellie Robinson, Gunnar Naulaers, Maarten De Vos, Caroline Hartley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tim HermansDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anneleen DereymaekerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Katrien LemmensDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Katrien JansenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Fatima UsmanDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Shellie RobinsonDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gunnar NaulaersDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Maarten De VosDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Caroline HartleyDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and generalization of NeoNaid, a fully automated software tool for neonatal EEG analysis, based on functional brain age (FBA) estimation and sleep staging. Methods: NeoNaid combines a multi-task deep learning model with proposed quality control routines detecting artifacts, out-of-distribution inputs, and uncertain predictions. Based on a raw EEG input, it outputs one global FBA estimate and a continuous 2-state hypnogram. We validated performance on two independent hospital settings: an internal dataset (33 EEGs, 17 infants, median 900 min/recording) and an external dataset (38 EEGs, 24 infants, median 124 min/recording). Results: Quality control rejected a comparable number of segments in the internal and external datasets, reducing extreme errors in FBA estimation, and modestly improving sleep staging accuracy. Across the internal and external data, NeoNaid achieved median absolute FBA errors of 0.50 and 0.55 weeks and Cohen's Kappa values of 0.89 and 0.87 for quiet sleep detection, respectively. Discussion: NeoNaid demonstrated improved reliability through integrated quality control and maintained performance across two independent datasets. By focusing on validation and trustworthiness, this work takes an essential step toward clinical adoption of automated neonatal EEG analysis and supports its utility for both NICU practice and large-scale research.

Indexed as

automated analysisclinical validationfunctional brain ageneonatal EEGquality controlsleep staging

Identifiers

PMID41835935
PMCPMC12982431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.