Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835926›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Increasing Innu participation in public health: a qualitative study of data governance among Innu in Labrador, Canada.

Leonor Mercedes Ward, Courtney Heffernan, Gonzalo Gustavo Alvarez, Annie Picard, Andre Carrington, Richard Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonor Mercedes WardTuberculosis Program Evaluation and Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0842-1542
Courtney HeffernanTuberculosis Program Evaluation and Research Unit, College of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gonzalo Gustavo AlvarezTaima TB Research Group, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Annie PicardInnu Round Table Secretariat, Sheshatshiu, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Andre CarringtonInuit Tapiriit Kanatami, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Richard LongTuberculosis Program Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Indigenous Peoples are not always engaged in setting health priorities and decry misapplication and misinterpretation of their data. Indigenous data governance and sovereignty can help overcome these issues, but they are variably implemented across Nations. Public health data governance is uniquely challenging, with implementation gaps presenting an exciting opportunity to define and remove barriers at all levels of government. Methods: We sought to identify barriers (what) and facilitators (how) to implementing a local data governance plan with the goal of increasing Innu participation in public health. Working with two First Nations in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, and supported by strong relationships, 18 participants who work with Innu health data across federal, provincial and Innu jurisdictions were interviewed and participated in group discussions to produce rich qualitative data on the subject. The research plan was led by the First Nations. Results: Participants identified that size and organisation matter to data governance, and novel partnerships must be considered to achieve the economies of scale necessary for infrastructure. Public health data have multiple custodians and require governance across multiple jurisdictions. Creating a round table (a space for dialogue among equals) to guide the appropriate collection, use and reporting of locally relevant public health data has emerged as an actionable recommendation. In this model, public health data were viewed as co-created by all parties, while Innu led analysis and interpretation. Barriers to data governance included the complexity of accessing data, lack of space to meet as equals, lack of common goals, mistrust and racism. Facilitators included the recognised need for an adequately resourced Innu Health Data Office, communication, trust and good relationships. Conclusion: For Innu, data governance advances self-determination, potentially redressing the current inequitable distribution of power in public health planning. Describing the challenges Innu face in operationalising public health data governance and strategies to overcome them may be generalisable to other Indigenous Nations attempting to do the same, especially those with small populations.

Indexed as

Population SurveillancePublic HealthQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41835926
PMCPMC12983697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.