Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835859›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Approaching human visual perception through AI-based representation of figure-ground segregation.

Chakkai Yip, Ezekiel Moroze, Shigeaki Nishina, Arash Yazdanbakhsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chakkai Yip *Computational Neuroscience and Vision Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Ezekiel Moroze *Computational Neuroscience and Vision Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Shigeaki NishinaHonda Research Institute Japan Co., Ltd., Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan.
Arash YazdanbakhshComputational Neuroscience and Vision Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding how the visual system assigns borders to foreground objects is central to figure-ground perception, yet the computational principles underlying this process are still under investigation. Methods: We trained multiple convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures on simple overlapping/occlusion stimuli and tested them on systematically degraded contours to probe how border-ownership (BOS) inference depends on available border context. Results: Across networks, BOS could be inferred from feedforward computations even under degraded conditions, but performance showed a strong dependence on junction-like configurations, indicating that geometric context contributes more than isolated edges. Accuracy increased approximately linearly with the amount of contextual information provided by fragmented borders, and representation analyses revealed a hierarchical progression from local edge responses to more spatially coherent, BOS-specific features. Discussion: Together, these results delineate which aspects of BOS can emerge from hierarchical feedforward processing and suggest that additional mechanisms such as horizontal and feedback interactions may reduce the visual information required for robust figure-ground segregation.

Indexed as

AI saliency mappingborder-ownershipcontour junctionsconvolutional neural networksfeedforward processesfigure-ground segregationpartial occlusion

Identifiers

PMID41835859
PMCPMC12982451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.