ArticleCureus2026
Correlating the Preoperative Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score With Baseline Motor Evoked Potential to Justify Neuromonitoring in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Surgery: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The ability to predict the measurable baseline motor evoked potential (MEP) in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) condition using a preoperative clinical score such as the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score may allow savings in healthcare costs, as intraoperative neuromonitoring contributes significantly to the rise of healthcare costs. Materials and methods This is a retrospective case cohort of 22 patients looking at the ability of the preoperative mJOA score to predict baseline MEP in DCM patients undergoing surgery in three regional spine centers over one year, from July 2023 to July 2024. Results MEP was indeterminate in 36% of patients. Using univariate threshold analysis and ROC curves, a classification threshold of 71% was chosen, where the mJOA score was 13. Binary logistic regression analysis showed an odds ratio of 1.22 (p=0.22). Every point of increase in the mJOA score leads to 21.76% increase in the likelihood of MEP being present at baseline. Conclusion An mJOA score of 13 gives a 71% probability of MEP being present. Increasing the value of the mJOA score increases the likelihood of MEP being present in the lower limb but fails to reach statistical significance. We suggest a greater number of patients while including other preoperative neurologic markers to predict the presence of baseline MEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.