ArticleCureus2026
A Qualified Multilingual Assessment for Medical Students: A Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Author's Reply: Rethinking Medical Spanish Competence: Language Proficiency, Clinical Communication, and Inclusion.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Rethinking Medical Spanish Competence: Language Proficiency, Clinical Communication, and Inclusion.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Effective clinical communication is essential for delivering high‑quality care and directly impacts the safety of patients who prefer a non‑English language. However, no national standard exists for assessing oral non-English language skills among multilingual medical students in the United States. Methods From June 2024 to November 2025, medical students who self-reported "very good" or "excellent" oral proficiency in a non-English language were invited to complete the ALTA Speaking and Listening Assessment, a qualified multilingual assessment (QMA) used to verify skills for direct communication in clinical care for patients with non-English language preference. Surveys captured students' perceptions of the assessment and use of non-English languages with patients after their clinical rotations. We present descriptive statistics of quantitative data and content summaries of qualitative data. Results There were 92 eligible students who completed 102 ALTA exams. Of these, 81 students passed at least one assessment. Most participants rated the assessment as extremely or very accurate (n=28, 82.3%) and the scheduling process as very or extremely easy to schedule (n=35, 97.2%). Some found the assessment overly formal. Among the 24 students who completed clinical rotations, 66.7% were asked to interpret, and 50% regularly used a non-English language with patients. Students described increased confidence and rapport-building with patients. Conclusion The QMA was feasible and acceptable for medical students. More research is needed to differentiate skills for direct language-concordant care from medical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.