ReviewCureus2026
High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Peri-Intubation Oxygenation in Pediatric Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Narrative Best-Evidence Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric rapid sequence intubation (RSI) carries a high risk of peri-intubation hypoxemia because children have limited oxygen reserve and desaturate rapidly during apnea. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an appealing adjunct because it can deliver high, humidified flows that reduce room air entrainment and support a more stable upper airway oxygen concentration, with modest flow and leak-dependent distending pressure and upper airway dead space washout. Across pediatric perioperative and sedation studies and in acute care cohorts, the most consistent signal is improved oxygenation reliability, with fewer or less severe desaturation events and fewer rescue interventions, rather than a predictable extension of safe apnea time, which remains variable across settings. Adult peri-intubation trials provide a comparator context and reinforce that the observed benefit depends on baseline hypoxemia and the comparator strategy, often favoring NIV in severe hypoxemia, limiting direct generalization to children. Pediatric RSI-specific randomized trials are needed with standardized flow protocols and clinically meaningful endpoints, including severe desaturation rates, nadir SpO₂, time spent below clinically relevant thresholds, need for rescue ventilation or interrupted laryngoscopy, first pass success, and adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.