Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835663›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Assessing Risk of Nephrolithiasis in Urology Residents: Are We Practicing What We Preach?

Hope Maine, Aashka Sheth, Craig Ziegler, Kellen Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hope MaineDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA.
Aashka ShethDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA.
Craig ZieglerGraduate Medical Education Research, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA.
Kellen ChoiDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Nephrolithiasis is a common urological condition that is treated by urologists. Urologists counsel patients on the importance of adequate hydration to decrease the risk of nephrolithiasis as well as the avoidance of specific diets that can contribute to the condition. To date, the risk of urology resident physicians developing nephrolithiasis during their residency has not been studied. This study aimed to investigate nephrolithiasis in urology residents and factors that may contribute to their potential protection or increased susceptibility to this pathology. Based on self-reported water intake, most respondents reported fluid consumption below commonly cited hydration targets, though guideline awareness and adherence were not directly assessed. Previous studies have examined residents' satisfaction with their programs, but none have investigated the occurrence of kidney stones among residents. Materials and methods Through a nationally distributed survey of current urology residents, this pilot study aimed to address these questions by examining variables such as caffeine consumption, PGY year, family history of kidney stones, personal history of kidney stones, and life satisfaction. Results The results indicated that as urology residents' PGY level increased, their water intake decreased. In addition, life satisfaction increased as PGY increased. Conclusion Future research on this topic will aim to expand the study cohort to include attending physicians at a later stage in their careers to compare attitudes and actions that may contribute to the occurrence of nephrolithiasis.

Indexed as

kidney stonesnephrolithiasisnephrolithiasis risk factorsresidencyurology

Identifiers

PMID41835663
PMCPMC12988828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.