ReviewCureus2026
Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) remains one of the most frequently reported occupational diseases worldwide. It occurs with epidemiologically significant frequency among workers exposed to hazardous noise levels and is largely predictable and preventable through effective workplace control measures. This review aimed to examine the evidence related to ONIHL in Saudi Arabia. A comprehensive search was conducted using major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, to identify relevant literature. A total of seven cross-sectional studies were included, involving 1,481 participants from different regions of Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of ONIHL varied significantly across occupational groups, ranging from 2% to 71.6%, with the highest rates reported among military personnel. This considerable variation is primarily attributable to differences in diagnostic methods. Across all studies, awareness of ONIHL and the use of hearing protection were generally poor. Many participants demonstrated limited knowledge and negative attitudes toward hearing conservation, particularly in high-risk environments such as dental settings and military operations. This review highlights a concerning combination of high prevalence rates of ONIHL and poor knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices among the Saudi population. Age, years of professional experience, and occupational noise exposure were all substantially correlated with ONIHL, suggesting an association between prolonged exposure and hearing impairment. These demographic and occupational risk factors underscore the urgent need for proactive and targeted prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.