ArticleCureus2026
Temporal Patterns of Healthcare Provider Referrals in an Emergency Department Research Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical research in the emergency department (ED) relies on healthcare providers to identify and refer eligible patients, yet the ED's fast-paced and unpredictable workflow can limit provider capacity for research participation. To inform more efficient engagement strategies for the Evaluating Microdosing in the Emergency Department (EMED) study, which is evaluating methods of initiating buprenorphine/naloxone from EDs, we examined temporal and provider-specific patterns of healthcare provider referrals (HCPRs).
objectiveTo quantify temporal variation in referral activity by comparing referral rates per hour across months, days of the week, and work shifts, adjusting for research assistant availability.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of HCPRs to the EMED study at the Vancouver General Hospital's ED from July 23, 2021, to December 31, 2023. Referral records captured provider type and referral timing and were analyzed during periods of research assistant coverage (morning 07:00-14:59, evening 15:00-22:59, and occasional overnight 23:00-06:59). We calculated referral frequency density (referrals per research-assistant hour), and compared rates across months, days of the week, and shifts using Poisson regression with an offset for research-assistant availability.
resultsFrom July 2021 to December 2023, we received 2,244 HCPRs, primarily from registered nurses (1,928; 85.9%), followed by physicians (230; 10.2%), other providers (56; 2.5%), pharmacists (26; 1.2%), and social workers (4; 0.2%). After adjusting for research assistant availability, referral rates varied by month (compared to January, higher in December (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.38); lower in September (IRR = 0.77)), by day of the week (compared to Monday, higher on Thursday (IRR = 1.39) and Friday (IRR = 1.20)), and by shift (compared to evenings, higher in mornings (IRR = 1.29); lower in overnights (IRR = 0.37)). Across all months, nurses consistently had the highest referral frequency density, with an apparent increase beginning in October 2022 that coincided with enhanced engagement activities, and a temporary decrease in November 2023 during a brief pause in EMED activity. Referral activity was most commonly observed during morning shifts for nurses, pharmacists, and other providers, whereas physician referrals shifted over time, with increased overnight referral frequency in later years.
conclusionHCPRs to EMED were temporally clustered by month, day of the week, and shift after accounting for research assistant availability, and were predominantly contributed by registered nurses, with an apparent increase following enhanced engagement activities. These patterns may help inform the timing and tailoring of future engagement approaches, particularly for provider groups with consistently low referral activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.