ArticleACS omega2026
Anisotropic Shrinkage Behavior of Overripe Papaya Slices (
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the shrinkage behavior of overripe papaya slices during convective drying at 50 and 60 °C under 20% relative humidity, without disturbing the process. The Lewis model accurately described drying kinetics at both temperatures. Papaya slices exhibited anisotropic shrinkage, with area and height reductions of (15 ± 3) % and (76 ± 5) % at 50 °C and (26 ± 7) % and (87 ± 3) % at 60 °C, respectively. Although fundamental models were evaluated, only empirical correlations effectively described area and height shrinkage at both temperatures. At 50 °C, a deviation of approximately 10% from linearity was observed between water loss and sample volume reduction, while at 60 °C, a deviation below 5% occurred, suggesting an ideal shrinkage. These differences could be related to the gap between the sample and glass transition temperatures. Drying rate behavior was comparable at both temperatures, despite the occurrence of area shrinkage, which could be explained by the relatively small extent of area shrinkage. At 50 °C, no constant period was observed, followed by a single falling rate period, whereas at 60 °C, a short constant rate period was followed by two falling rate periods. Effective moisture diffusivity was evaluated with and without considering height shrinkage. When height shrinkage was neglected, diffusivity values were overestimated, particularly during the second falling period at 60 °C, when moisture mobility is expected to decrease. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating shrinkage into drying kinetics modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.