ArticleACS omega2026
Driving Hydrolysis and Acetolysis of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) by Microwave and Thermal Energy Inputs: A Comparative Study.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compares microwave and conventional thermal energy inputs for the hydrolysis and acetolysis of both virgin and postconsumer poly-(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). Reaction conditions in these experiments range from 200 to 300 °C and from 5 to 90 min. In no instances did the yields of terephthalic acid monomer or incompletely depolymerized PET demonstrate statistically significant or practically significant differences with these two different energy inputs. For fixed reaction conditions, yields of terephthalic acid were comparable from both methods, regardless of whether the reaction medium was water, acetic acid, or a mixture of the two. The visual appearance of the unreacted plastic was likewise the same for microwave and conventional thermal energy inputs when using identical solvents. These results suggest that the bulk fluid temperature is the controlling factor for PET depolymerization in a homogeneous fluid phase of water and/or acetic acid with no added catalyst. The reacting system responds similarly whether the heating is via microwave irradiation or via conduction across the reactor wall.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.