Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835505›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Driving Hydrolysis and Acetolysis of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) by Microwave and Thermal Energy Inputs: A Comparative Study.

Patrícia Pereira, Ashley C Daniszewski, Matthew Staack, Emir Salmanzadeh, Hilal Ezgi Toraman, Jianli Hu, Christian W Pester, Phillip E Savage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrícia PereiraWaltemeyer Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4441-7121
Ashley C DaniszewskiDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.
Matthew StaackDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.
Emir SalmanzadehWaltemeyer Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5259-8065
Hilal Ezgi ToramanWaltemeyer Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3793-2640
Jianli HuDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-861X
Christian W PesterWaltemeyer Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7624-4165
Phillip E SavageWaltemeyer Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-3744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares microwave and conventional thermal energy inputs for the hydrolysis and acetolysis of both virgin and postconsumer poly-(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). Reaction conditions in these experiments range from 200 to 300 °C and from 5 to 90 min. In no instances did the yields of terephthalic acid monomer or incompletely depolymerized PET demonstrate statistically significant or practically significant differences with these two different energy inputs. For fixed reaction conditions, yields of terephthalic acid were comparable from both methods, regardless of whether the reaction medium was water, acetic acid, or a mixture of the two. The visual appearance of the unreacted plastic was likewise the same for microwave and conventional thermal energy inputs when using identical solvents. These results suggest that the bulk fluid temperature is the controlling factor for PET depolymerization in a homogeneous fluid phase of water and/or acetic acid with no added catalyst. The reacting system responds similarly whether the heating is via microwave irradiation or via conduction across the reactor wall.

Identifiers

PMID41835505
PMCPMC12980214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.