ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Perioperative management of colorectal surgical patients receiving a direct oral anticoagulant: a scoping review, particular emphasis on procedure-specific risks, and pharmacogenomics.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative management of patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or atrial fibrillation (AF), who subsequently undergo elective colorectal surgery, is a frequent clinical scenario with no clear consensus on best practices. Further complicating this issue, venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding rates vary widely, ranging from 4.8% to 12.6% for VTE and 1.1% to 2.4% for bleeding, across different procedures (e.g., abdominoperineal resection, anterior resection, rectopexy, colectomy, and total proctocolectomy), as well as between countries, centers and individual surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary for surgeons to identify strategies to optimize when and how to discontinue and resume anticoagulation. Over the past decade, substantial interpatient variability in DOAC plasma levels has been observed, potentially explaining the frequent incidence of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (e.g., anastomotic bleeding and hematochezia) and breakthrough VTE in colorectal surgical patients. Given that pharmacokinetic factors, including genetic variations in metabolizing enzymes and efflux transporters as well as drug plasma levels measured by anti-factor Xa (FXa) activity, are associated with both the efficacy and adverse effects of anticoagulants, genotyping and anti-FXa monitoring could play a valuable role in optimizing perioperative DOAC management or enabling personalized dose adjustments. This scoping review summarizes the current evidence and proposes an integrated, personalized approach for perioperative DOAC management in colorectal surgery, with particular emphasis on procedure-specific risks, pharmacogenomics, and individualized risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.