ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
An ethnopharmacological assessment of medicinal plants in Malanje Municipality, Angola.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malanje Municipality in north-central Angola harbors exceptional botanical and cultural diversity, yet remains poorly documented for traditional medicinal plant knowledge; this study provides the first systematic ethnopharmacological baseline to guide pharmacological prioritization, conservation, and policy-relevant integration of traditional medicine. Methods: Between 2018 and 2023, we conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 20 traditional healers), participatory observation, Results: Informants reported 272 ethnospecies, of which 78 taxa (39 families) were identified to species level. Fabaceae (9%), Asteraceae (6.4%), and Euphorbiaceae, Poaceae, and Zingiberaceae (each 5.1%) were most represented families. Leaves (53.8%) and roots (42.3%) were the principal parts used; decoction (60%) and maceration (31%) were the most common preparations. ROP prioritized Conclusion: This work provides the first comprehensive ethnopharmacological register for Malanje Municipality, highlighting high-priority species for phytochemical, pharmacological, and toxicological evaluation and identifying conservation and sustainable-use concerns (notably root harvest). Limitations include a modest sample of informants and incomplete taxonomic resolution for many ethnospecies. Recommendations: Expand sampling across the province, complete voucher identification, perform contamination and toxicity screening, and develop community-led cultivation and stewardship plans that align with Angola's National Policy for Traditional and Complementary Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.