Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835445›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026

From Simulation to Conversation: Simulated Patients' Contribution to Meaningful Feedback Dialogues.

Annelies Lovink, Karlijn Geelkerken, Heleen Miedema, Jan-Joost Rethans, Walther van Mook, Marleen Groenier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annelies LovinkDepartment of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-1466
Karlijn GeelkerkenDepartment of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-4801-1851
Heleen MiedemaDepartment of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-7902
Jan-Joost RethansSchool of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5977-3014
Walther van MookSchool of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2398-8878
Marleen GroenierDepartment of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7298-8431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Simulated patients (SPs) play a key role in medical communication training, yet their contribution to feedback dialogues during post-simulation feedback sessions remains underexplored. This study explored how SPs contribute to meaningful feedback dialogues among students during feedback sessions after simulation-based consultations. Methods: Using an interpretivist qualitative approach, video-recorded feedback sessions with first-year technical medical students and SPs were analyzed. Episodes identified as meaningful feedback dialogues were thematically analyzed, focusing on SP contributions. Results: Of the 120 one-minute episodes during feedback sessions, 36 episodes were classified as meaningful feedback dialogue. These were characterized by one or more of the following aspects: SPs' guidance on task performance, shifting positions of SPs, and SPs supporting the contribution of students by facilitating and creating space. Discussion: SPs' guidance on task performance appears to respond to students' need for direction. While such guidance can support learning, it also risks reducing student reflection. Therefore, SPs need awareness of when and how to provide guidance. Although instructed to remain in the patient positions, SPs adopt multiple positions: the patient's position, the expert's position, and the meta-position during the feedback dialogue, which can enrich learning if managed consciously. Increasing SPs' awareness of these different ways of contributing to students' learning may enhance their educational impact in communication training.

Indexed as

CommunicationFeedbackFormative FeedbackPatient SimulationClinical CompetenceHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID41835445
PMCPMC12985862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.