Ethics of Informed Consent with Comprehension of Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Parit T Mavani, Sean Z Goodin, David A Kooby, Mihir M Shah

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Acta scientific cancer biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Parit T MavaniDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Sean Z GoodinDepartment of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

David A KoobyDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Mihir M ShahDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026

$92.1M

Emory Clinical Oncology Career Development Award K12 ProgramK12CA237806 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DHODAPKAR, KAVITA MADHAV, RAMALINGAM, SURESH S · 2019 to 2023

$2.2M

NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NCI NIH HHS K12 CA237806

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy with limited treatment options. Communicating risks and benefits in detail related to each treatment option as a part of the informed consent process is crucial to actively engage patients in their care process. Older age and emotional distress after diagnosis may impair cognitive impairment and compromise their autonomy in making an informed decision. Involvement of a multi-disciplinary team in the care process and supplementing various treatment option discussions with visual illustrations may help in simplifying complex information and improving patient understanding.

Indexed as

EthicsInformed consentPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPancreatoduodenectomyWhipple

Identifiers

PMID41835444

PMCPMC12981639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.