ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Understanding school-based rehabilitation services through the lived experiences of children and youth with disabilities: a meta-aggregative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children and youth with disabilities continue to face barriers to accessing quality education, despite education being a key social determinant of health. School-based rehabilitation services (SBRS) include occupational therapy (OT), physiotherapy (PT), and speech-language pathology (SLP) that are delivered within the school context to address these barriers by promoting participation and inclusion. However, the implementation of SBRS has largely prioritized adult perspectives, with limited consideration of the lived experiences of children and youth with disabilities. Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for meta-aggregation, this review synthesizes primary qualitative studies exploring the lived experiences of children and youth with disabilities who receive SBRS. Following a systematic selection process and critical appraisal, 13 studies were included. A total of 53 findings were extracted, grouped into 14 categories, and synthesized into six overarching findings. Specifically, children and youth reported that they want (i) therapists to increase their autonomy and agency by clearly communicating the purpose and goals of therapy and supporting their ability to make informed choices; (ii) therapists to adopt a holistic approach by addressing both social-emotional and functional needs; (iii) therapists who are knowledgeable, supportive, empathetic, and who advocate for their needs; (iv) therapy that is individualized, meaningful, enjoyable, and scheduled in a way that respects school routines, enhancing their participation in both therapy and broader school life; (v) therapy to help them build skills supporting social connection and inclusion at school; and (vi) therapy in which they set goals and develop new skills. Findings showed children and youth with disabilities want to be involved in their therapy and expect therapists to equip them with skills to participate, make decisions, and be included at school and in therapy. The findings have important implications for SBRS practice and policy, highlighting the importance of centering the voices of children and youth with disabilities. Attending to children's and youths' perspectives can help foster practices and policies that are inclusive, holistic, and child-centered, and supports the development of services that are meaningful, empowering, and promote full participation in school life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.