SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Hospital preparedness exercises for paediatric mass casualty incidents: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) present a global threat to civilians, with children often being affected and sometimes even targeted; however, there is little research regarding the preparedness exercises of healthcare professionals for such events. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase from inception up to July 2025, was conducted. Risk of bias was also assessed using the risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions exposure (ROBINS E) tool. Results: The initial search generated 223 results, and following double screening and manual citation searching, 17 observational studies were selected for narrative synthesis, since numerical data to perform meta-analysis were unavailable. The review identified a broad range of training interventions tailored for paediatric MCIs. Both brief, frequent drills and longer, mixed methods training schemes were effective, yielding gains in specific skills and a holistic sense of preparedness, including teamwork and communication. These improvements were often sustained for up to 6 months, despite a common limitation of lost to follow-up. However, the overall risk of bias in the included studies were high to very high. Discussion: MCI educational schemes appear to improve all aspects of preparedness. However, the evidence is heterogeneous, lacked standardisation in the outcome measures and contained high to very high risk of bias, suggesting that the current evidence cannot support definitive recommendations. Future research should aim to conduct high-quality studies with standardised outcome assessment tools to optimise paediatric MCI preparedness. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251084048.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.