ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Translating community voices to build meaningful engagement: a Community Health Worker led study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding community perspectives on barriers and facilitators of meaningful engagement, equitable decision making, and sustainable community improvement is critical for advancing health equity. Community Health Workers can make significant contributions to research teams, as they are bridges into communities and bring unique perspectives. This study describes community voices on barriers to authentic engagement and insights on strategies to build trust, as well as the way in which these data were translated into a tangible assessment tool and a community-facilitated learning academy. Methods: A team of Community Health Workers led a series of 24 'open mic' discussions in four South Carolina communities. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed inductively. Results: Participants were mostly female (83%), African American (88%), and had a range of education, ages, and levels of engagement. Community concerns (violence, lack of resources, and insufficient economic development) were a primary focus of conversation. Barriers to community engagement include not having sufficient input into what the engagement focus should be, mistrust in outsiders (which in part stems from a history of racism), lack of voice in decision-making, and broken promises. Participants view trust as the essential building block for community engagement, which takes genuine connections, listening, consistency, commitment, and follow-through. These data were used to inform the Prioritizing Long-lasting Actionable Community Engagement & Equity (P.L.A.C.E.) Academy, which aims to equip community leaders with tools for meaningful engagement. Discussion: Our findings confirm the Aligning Systems for Health framework, which calls for attention to equity, power dynamics, trust, and the need to let community generate priorities and solutions. Academic, public health, healthcare and social service partners must work with communities to ensure that community issues are addressed respectfully and equitably. Our data driven curriculum is a critical step toward stronger engagement, enhanced communication, and improved health outcomes. Developing research teams that include Community Health Workers is a pragmatic strategy that can lead to better insights, greater trust, balances in power, and ultimately, greater health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.