ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The living will system in mainland China: legislative status quo, dilemmas and prospects.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the right of patients to make autonomous decisions about life-sustaining treatment has gained wider recognition, many countries have introduced legislation on living wills. Over the past two decades, mainland China has seen a gradual shift from voluntary advocacy by civil-society organizations to initial local legislation, culminating in the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone Medical Regulations (2023), the first statute to recognize the legal effect of living wills. Yet the emerging living will system continues to be hindered by multiple factors at both the legislative and implementation stages. This article identifies three main challenges: vague statutory definitions of key concepts; the lack of supporting mechanisms, particularly for registration and revocation; and tensions between the practice of living wills and traditional cultural understandings of death and filial piety. On this basis, it proposes reforms to clarify in legislation the qualifications of parties eligible to execute living wills and the scope of their application, to establish a unified and accessible registration-revocation system, and to reinterpret the normative foundations of the living will system in light of local cultural values. The analysis aims to provide a roadmap for strengthening institutional safeguards for patients' medical autonomy in China and to offer comparative insights for other developing countries considering similar legislation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.