ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
The distress of psychological adaptation in nutritional management among people after esophagectomy: an interpretative phenomenological study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients who undergo esophagectomy frequently encounter long-term nutrition impact symptoms (NISs) and dietary challenges resulting from anatomical and functional alterations. Although these issues adversely affect mental health, the underlying psychological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aimed to explore the psychological experiences of post-esophagectomy people diagnosed with esophageal cancer regarding nutritional management to elucidate the impact of nutritional challenges on mental health. Methods: A purposive sample of 16 who had undergone esophagectomy for esophageal cancer was recruited. Data were collected via semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). The analysis followed the hermeneutic circle principle through iterative coding, theme development, and the synthesis of cross-case patterns. Results: Three principal themes emerged: (1) cognitive and behavioral adaptation to gastrointestinal symptoms; (2) adaptive challenges and identity reconstruction in family dietary contexts; and (3) survival significance and social pressures in nutritional management. Collectively, these factors reinforced the "cancer patient" identity and impeded psychological recovery. Conclusion: This study revealed that persistent NISs, unmet recovery expectations, and role-identity conflicts contribute to anxiety, helplessness, and confusion regarding health identity. These findings emphasized the necessity of patient-centered nutritional interventions that address symptom-related cognitive anxiety, facilitate familial support for dietary adaptation, and balance disease risk management with the enjoyment of food. These insights provide a theoretical foundation for developing personalized, integrated nutritional and psychological support programs to enhance the mental health and quality of life of esophageal cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.