Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835360›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

"I Don't Want to Read About It; I Want to Do It": Perspectives on

Brianne Wood, Ghislaine Attema, Erin Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brianne WoodMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Ghislaine AttemaDr Gilles Arcand Centre for Health Equity, NOSM University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6403-3416
Erin CameronDr Gilles Arcand Centre for Health Equity, NOSM University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Medical schools and healthcare institutions are increasingly committing to social accountability, the reorientation and prioritization of addressing local community health needs. Now, as part of this commitment, schools and institutions are called upon to demonstrate evidence of their progress towards social accountability to governments, accreditors, funders, and communities. This study aimed to understand what Methods: One-on-one semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with three diverse groups: academic, health services, and community interest holders to understand multiple perspectives on social accountability in health professional education. Respondents were asked how they perceive, actualize, and measure social accountability at different levels (societal, school, individual). Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed. Results: Eighteen interviews were conducted, with eight academic representatives, six health care professionals, and four community leaders. The researchers identified three high-level themes in their analysis: the definition of social accountability, enacting and embodying social accountability, and measuring social accountability. There were distinct differences in terms of defining, executing, and evaluating Conclusion: Respondents emphasized that defining what social accountability means for a specific context is critical to advancing the movement. Acknowledging that there are similarities and differences between

Indexed as

impact measurementperceptionsqualitative methodologysocial accountability

Identifiers

PMID41835360
PMCPMC12983397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.