Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835346›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2026

Constrictive Pericarditis and Effusive Constrictive Pericarditis: Is There a Role for Medical Therapy?

Lamis El Harake, Mohamed Al-Kazaz, Paul C Cremer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lamis El HarakeBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4228-7347
Mohamed Al-KazazBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9357-0175
Paul C CremerBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-3306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constrictive pericarditis (CP) represents a spectrum of pericardial diseases characterized by impaired ventricular filling due to a noncompliant pericardium. Within this continuum, effusive constrictive pericarditis (ECP) and transient constrictive pericarditis are characterized by active inflammation. ECP combines pericardial effusion and constrictive physiology, whereas transient constrictive pericarditis is characterized by resolution, often after anti-inflammatory therapy. These conditions often result from idiopathic, post-surgical, autoimmune, or tuberculous causes and may progress from acute inflammation to chronic fibrosis and calcification, termed chronic constrictive pericarditis. Multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiac computed tomography, plays a key role in establishing the diagnosis, assessing inflammation, and guiding treatment. In patients with active pericardial inflammation, increasing evidence and practice supports the early and combined initiation of anti-inflammatory therapy including nonsteroidal agents, colchicine, corticosteroids, and interleukin-1 inhibitors to reverse constrictive pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsPericardial EffusionPericarditis, ConstrictivePericardiumHumansPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agentsconstrictive pericarditiseffusive constrictive pericarditismedical therapymultimodality imagingpericardial inflammation

Identifiers

PMID41835346
PMCPMC12985894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.