ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
gLeiden: accelerated community detection algorithms using directed and undirected graphs on GPUs.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Community detection methods are applied to single cell RNA sequencing (i.e. scRNA-seq) and mass cytometry data to efficiently identify major cell types and their subtypes, but their computational demands increase, particularly given the substantial growth in dataset sizes. The Leiden algorithm, an emerging method in this field, offers inherent parallelism that remains underutilized due to the limited parallel processing capabilities offered by today's modern multi-core CPUs, which have fewer than 100 cores (typically 32-64 CPUs). However, Leiden can achieve significant performance gains when implemented on GPUs. GPUs offer high memory bandwidth and an extensive array of parallel processing units that map well to the parallelism in Leiden. As far as we know, cuGraph is the only implementation that has mapped the Leiden algorithm to GPUs, using a blend of Python and C languages. However, it only supports undirected graphs, potentially discarding the valuable information carried by edge directionality. In addition, this Python implementation for GPUs is comparatively slower than a C/C++ based implementation, reducing the significant performance gains provided by a GPU-based speedup. Conversely, a C/C++ based implementation optimizes performance more effectively, ensuring an accurate baseline comparison when performing GPU acceleration. Results: We developed a tool named gLeiden, a lightweight CUDA C++ based GPU implementation of the Leiden algorithm and, to the best of our knowledge, the very first GPU implementation that supports directed graphs, which generally demands nearly twice the computational time and memory resources compared to undirected graphs. The results show that our directed gLeiden outperforms the directed cLeiden version and shows 11× and 12× speedup on very large datasets. Our undirected ucLeiden and ugLeiden implementations significantly outperform the original Java version, with up to 42× speedup on large datasets. However, when comparing the undirected ugLeiden version with cuGraph, ugLeiden performance is comparable on smaller datasets and 58% faster on larger datasets. These results position our GPU-based Leiden implementation as a high-performance alternative to existing state-of-the-art community detection tools. Availability and implementation: The source code and sample data are available at: https://github.com/Beenishgul/Leiden and https://figshare.com/s/3b51e463a56e2a374bdf.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.