ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development
The Role of Narrative Medicine in Radiation Oncology Education: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive review examines the emerging role of narrative medicine in radiation oncology education, exploring its theoretical foundations, implementation models, and reported outcomes. A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for relevant studies published between January 2000 and March 2025. This comprehensive review approach enabled synthesis of diverse evidence types and implementation models in this emerging field. Despite the growing body of literature on narrative medicine in general medical education, its specific application within radiation oncology remains limited but promising. The review identifies several key domains where narrative medicine interventions show potential: Enhancing communication skills with patients undergoing complex treatments, developing resilience among trainees facing emotionally challenging clinical scenarios, and addressing burnout among radiation oncology professionals. Preliminary evidence, primarily from single-institution studies at large academic centers, suggests that structured reflective writing programs and narrative oncology curricula may effectively complement technical training in radiation oncology residency programs. However, significant gaps exist in the literature regarding standardized implementation approaches and rigorous outcome assessments. Cultural adaptations for implementing narrative medicine across different healthcare contexts are also explored. This review concludes that while narrative medicine offers promising approaches to humanize radiation oncology education, more robust research is needed to establish best practices, evaluate long-term impacts, and address implementation challenges in this highly technical specialty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.