Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835294›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Refractory Glaucoma: Two-year Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Fengbin Lin, Yuhong Wang, Xuanchu Duan, Baiyu Hu, Yingying Xue, Qiying Ling, Dilimulati Xiaokaiti, Zhenni Zhao, Yunhe Song, Zige Fang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fengbin Lin *State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuhong Wang *Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0377-7213
Xuanchu Duan *Changsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Baiyu HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Yingying XueXiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Qiying LingChangsha Aier Eye Hospital, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Dilimulati XiaokaitiDepartment of Ophthalmology Center, The First People's Hospital of Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Zhenni ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yunhe SongState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zige FangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yu ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ling JinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Liuzhi ZengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Xiulan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) for refractory glaucoma. Patients and Methods: This prospective multicenter study included 62 eyes of 57 refractory glaucoma patients. MP-TSCPC was performed from August 2022 to May 2023. All patients had a complete ophthalmic examination preoperatively, including medical history, slit-lamp examination, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, and pre- and post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. The main outcomes included IOP change, antiglaucoma medication use, the cumulative incidence of treatment success, and the postoperative complications over 24 months. Treatment success was defined as an IOP reduction of more than 20% compared with baseline or a decrease in the number of antiglaucoma medications with stable target IOP. Retreatments were classified as failures. Results: The glaucoma subtypes included primary glaucoma (n=29) and secondary glaucoma (n=33). Prior glaucoma surgery had been performed in 48 of the 62 eyes (77.4%), with 30 of them having multiple types of surgery. Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 38.2±10.3 mmHg and the median number of antiglaucoma medications used was 3.0 (2.0, 3.0); these values decreased to 20.9±8.8 mmHg (a reduction of 42.7%; P<0.001) and 2.0 (0.0, 3.0) (P<0.001) at month 24, respectively. The treatment success rate was 77.4% at 24 months. Postoperative complications included mydriasis (n=10), conjunctival hemorrhage (n=9), mild anterior chamber inflammation (n=1), hyphema (n=1), mild ciliary body detachment (n=3), and choroidal detachment (n=1), all reversible after treatment. Conclusion: MP-TSCPC appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for refractory glaucoma.

Indexed as

micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulationmulticenter studyprospective studyrefractory glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID41835294
PMCPMC12984070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.