ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Long-Term Evaluation of Contrast Sensitivity and Vision Quality for High and Extreme High Myopia After EVO ICL Implantation.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the contrast sensitivity (CS) and vision quality of patients with high and extreme high myopia following long-term evolution implantable collamer lens (EVO ICL) implantation. Patients and Methods: Thirty-five patients (60 eyes) with a myopia range of -7.25 D to -18.50 D were enrolled. Participants were categorized into the high myopia (HM) (spherical equivalent>-12.0 D) and extreme high myopia (EHM) (spherical equivalent≤-12.0 D) groups. Routine examinations, including measurements of endothelial cell density and anterior chamber parameters, were performed. CS and vision quality were assessed over a long-term follow-up period, with an average final follow-up time of 7.29±0.82 years. Results: All surgical procedures were completed without any significant complications. No statistical differences for the CS parameters at the six different spatial frequencies in the corrected and uncorrected conditions were identified between the two groups (P>0.05). The vision quality questionnaire results indicated both groups reported concerns regarding the frequency of halos (HM group 57.6%, EHM group 63%). Driving was identified as the most distressing postoperative daily life activity. Further analysis revealed a negative correlation between driving distress and CS (B=-0.40, P<0.01). The preoperative axial length was found to be correlated with CS (B=-0.39, P<0.01). Conclusion: Patients with HM and EHM maintained good long-term CS and vision quality after EVO ICL implantation. Halos and driving distress were the most common complaints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.