ReviewInfection and drug resistance2026
Beyond Thresholds: CMV Replication Kinetics as Early Predictors of Clinical Risk in Transplant Recipients.
Review in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a pervasive beta herpes virus which establishes latency after primary infection. CMV infection after solid organ transplant is common and associated with negative outcomes for both the allograft and patient. The medications that are available can be associated with significant toxicity and do not provide a cure. Reliable protection from recurrence and freedom from antiviral therapy requires development of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI). This can be difficult to achieve after transplant in the setting of immunosuppressive medications due to the complexity of the immune response required to control the virus and often leads to prolonged antiviral courses and lengthy monitoring periods. While assays exist to measure CMI, they are not widely available and can pose challenges related to cost and collection restrictions. Conversely, viral replication trends utilizing widely available molecular diagnostics in tandem with risk factor assessment can be used as surrogate markers for the presence and development of CMI which can guide need for antiviral prophylaxis or treatment. The purpose of this review is to establish a foundation for the immunology of CMV and widely used molecular diagnostics, highlight CMV-specific CMI testing as an emerging molecular diagnostic tool, justify how the currently available antiviral drugs have limitations in their utility and outline the opportunity to use viral replication and replication kinetics, rather than absolute viral load thresholds, as a tool to understand the complex interplay of the host's immune response and the virus' capacity for replication while guiding clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.