ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2026
Feasibility and safety of training with an exoskeletal robotic device for Japanese individuals with spinal cord injuries: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To provide practical suggestions for the clinical application of robotic exoskeletal orthoses, we conducted a retrospective survey of patients with spinal cord lesions. [Participants and Methods] We studied the records of patients with spinal cord lesions who were trained using the ReWalk system (ReWalk Robotics). These records included the neurological level of injury, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, time since injury, total training time, adverse events, level of assistance required, dropouts, and reasons for dropout. [Results] Twenty-eight patients were trained with the ReWalk system at least once. Three of them underwent a modified training program owing to their severe paralysis. Eight patients dropped out from the regular training program or required a moderate or greater level of assistance. Twelve patients regained ambulation with the ReWalk system in indoor environments on a flat surface. The remaining five achieved ambulation with the ReWalk system in outdoor environments, including on slopes. Thirty-four adverse events were recorded. These events resolved within a few days with rest, adhesive dressing bandages, or other means. [Conclusion] The feasibility and safety of the training program and the outcomes achieved were comparable to those in previous studies. The device fit may need more careful attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.