ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2026
Inter-rater reliability of affected-side weight bearing ratio measurement in postoperative patients with proximal femoral fractures.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] We examined the inter-rater reliability of the affected-side weight-bearing ratio in patients who have undergone proximal femoral fracture surgery. [Participants and Methods] Ten patients with hip fractures were included in this study. Weight-bearing ratios were measured five times daily on postoperative days 3, 5, and 7. Three physical therapists independently assessed the patients. [Results] High intra-class correlation coefficients were observed across all days and measurement trials. The coefficient of variation (CV) showed no significant difference between days. CV was negatively associated with weight-bearing ratio but was not influenced by pain, body-mass index, age, sex, or surgical procedure. [Conclusion] In patients with proximal femoral hip fractures, weight-bearing ratio measurements on the affected side demonstrated high inter-rater reliability, even in a single trial from postoperative day 3. Pain during weight-bearing may contribute to variability in measurements, particularly in patients with low weight-bearing ratios. This method is feasible, minimally burdensome, and can be implemented in various rehabilitation environments without the need for specialized equipment. Future studies should examine its generalizability across multiple facilities and assess its reliability in patients with cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.