ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2026
[Intra- and after-action reviews of public health emergencies: report of the Brazilian experience and achievements, 2023 to 2025Evaluación durante y después de una emergencia de salud pública: experiencia y avances de Brasil entre el 2023 y el 2025].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intra and after action reviews (IARs and AARs) are essential for the management of public health emergencies. This article reports on the experience of developing an IAR and AAR method by the Ministry of Health in Brazil, highlighting its conceptual and organizational foundations and its application in different public health emergency contexts from 2023 to 2025, a period during which 10 evaluations were conducted nationwide. The method was developed through a participatory process, based on a literature review and consultations with national and international experts, and was validated by consensus. The reviews were carried out in partnership with state health departments, using methodologies such as in-person workshops, structured debriefings, response action assessment tools, and individual instruments, often in combination. The number of participants ranged from 40 to 80 professionals, including managers, technical staff, and representatives from multiple sectors. The duration of activities ranged from meetings lasting a few hours to 2-day workshops. The reviews revealed good practices, challenges, and next steps that informed the updating of contingency plans and the incorporation of lessons learned into national and subnational policies and guidelines, synthesized in a Guide for After Action Review of Public Health Emergencies published by the Ministry of Health. This experience underscores the importance of incorporating IARs and AARs as strategic components of public health emergency preparedness and response. The process strengthens organizational learning, enhances the legitimacy of actions, and contributes to building a culture of continuous monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.