ArticleBMC agriculture2026
Genomic-assisted refinement of heterotic groups in short-duration maturing tropical yellow and orange maize inbred lines.
Article in BMC agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding the genetic diversity and population structure of maize inbred lines is fundamental for effective hybrid development and strategic heterosis exploitation. The objective of this study was to refine and validate heterotic groups within a diverse collection of extra-early and early maturing tropical yellow and orange maize inbred lines. A total of 1,437 elite tropical yellow and orange maize inbred lines spanning early and extra-early maturing groups were genotyped using a panel of 3,305 DArTag SNP markers. In addition, the study evaluated 280 hybrids comprising 276 hybrids (from 214 inbred lines crossed with four standard testers) and four commercial checks. The yield performance trials used a 14 × 20 alpha-lattice design with two replicates over two years. Results: Marker-based diversity analysis revealed average marker polymorphism of 0.328, minor allele frequency of 0.265, and expected heterozygosity of 0.315. Principal component analysis (PCA), discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC), and ancestral admixture analysis revealed three genetic clusters, while phylogenetic analysis supported the existence of two major clusters with groups one and three from DAPC and admixture methods combined into a single phylogenetic group. Several sub-groups were identified within the main genetic pools and maturity rather than kernel color was the major driver of these sub-groups. For operational ease in breeding applications, the lines were assigned to two major heterotic groups. The average performance of the hybrid for grain yield and heterosis estimates from between maturity-based heterotic subgroups were consistently and significantly ( Conclusion: These results provide a robust framework for parental line selection, heterotic grouping, and hybrid breeding strategies, facilitating the development of extra-early and early superior yellow/orange maize hybrids adapted to tropical environments. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44399-026-00032-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.