ArticleMathematical geosciences2026
Geostatistical Analysis of Seabed Sediment Type: A Compositional Approach with Non-Euclidean Distance Metrics.
Article in Mathematical geosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Although geostatistics is increasingly used to characterize coastal habitats, its full potential cannot be achieved through the blind application of off-the-shelf methods. Tools need to be tailored to the characteristics of each site and parameter; in particular, (1) complex coastal geometries might require the use of nonlinear measures of spatial proximity, and (2) the compositional nature of the variables hampers the application of traditional multivariate and kriging techniques; for example, the variance-covariance matrix is singular, while there is no guarantee that predicted percentages sum to 100%. Approaches to tackle both issues are introduced and illustrated using a multivariate dataset that includes, for 170 stations, sediment grain size distribution. The matrix of over-water distances between each pair of stations underwent a multidimensional scaling to create a new data configuration where Euclidean distances between observations approximate the original over-water distances, allowing the sound application of variogram modeling and kriging prediction. Then, a compositional data analysis was conducted by first transforming each set of textural fractions into a set of log-ratios that underwent a geostatistical analysis, leading to coherent sediment texture maps. The interpolation of texture classes relied on residual kriging and a spatial trend model that was built using machine learning and geomorphometric variables derived from bathymetry data (water depth, slope, roughness). For this particular dataset, using non-Euclidean distances and log-ratios resulted in the most accurate predictions for texture classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.