Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

DenseLes: slice-wise dense network for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation and classification.

Melinda Katona, Bence Bozsik, Péter Bodnár, Krisztián Kocsis, Eszter Tóth, Nikoletta Szabó, András Király, Péter Faragó, László G Nyúl, Dániel Veréb and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melinda KatonaDepartment of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Bence BozsikDepartment of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Péter BodnárDepartment of Image Processing and Computer Graphics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Krisztián KocsisDepartment of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Eszter TóthDepartment of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Nikoletta SzabóDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
András KirályDepartment of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Péter FaragóDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
László G NyúlDepartment of Image Processing and Computer Graphics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Dániel VerébDepartment of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsigmond Tamás KincsesDepartment of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reliable segmentation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosis and monitoring disease progression. Therefore, a robust and efficient automated approach can rapidly provide information about the patient. Here, a convolutional neural network-based method is proposed to segment lesions from FLAIR images. The DenseLessystem includes two stages: pre-processing of image data (brain extraction, standardization), then segmentation of MS lesions using an end-to-end slice-wise dense network. We also identified the segmented lesions in specific locations [periventricular, (juxta)cortical, infratentorial, and spinal]. DenseLesis evaluated and compared to other methods on our assembled data and the public MSSEG 2016 MS challenge dataset. Our model demonstrates a significant improvement in segmentation quality over previous approaches, achieving an average Dice score of 0.80% on the Szeged MS dataset. On the MSSEG 2016 dataset, our method achieved Dice scores ranging from 0.32% to 0.73%, comparable to those of human raters.

Indexed as

brain extractionbrain MRIconvolutional neural networks (CNN)lesion segmentationmultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID41835080
PMCPMC12979175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.