ArticleAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2025
Deep Learning-Based Drug Half-Life Classification to Enhance Drug Development and Pharmacokinetics.
Article in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Predicting drug half-life is essential in pharmacokinetics (PK), influencing dosing strategies and guiding drug development. Traditional regression models estimate exact half-life values but are sensitive to pharmacokinetic variability, limiting their practical use. This study introduces a classification-based approach that separates drugs into short and long half-life groups using a 12-hour threshold, offering clearer clinical interpretability. Methods: Molecular structures were processed using a convolutional neural network (CNN), specifically a fine-tuned AlexNet, to extract high-level features. These extracted features served as inputs for a neural network classifier. A holdout validation strategy was applied, with data split into 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing. Model performance was assessed based on classification accuracy and F1-score. Results: The model achieved an F1-score of 90.9% at the optimal feature dimension of 10. Accuracy reached 96.2% on validation data and 92.3% on test data, demonstrating strong generalization capabilities. Compared to regression-based methods, this framework better accounts for variability in drug half-life and yield results that are easier to interpret in clinical contexts. Conclusion: This work proposes an efficient method for drug half-life classification, supporting drug formulation and dosing strategies. The findings highlight the value of classification in early drug development and provide a robust, scalable tool for pharmacokinetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.