Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41835040›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Adherence to Recommended Immunisation Schedules for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) on Biologics: A Retrospective Study at Our Lady's Hospital, Navan, Ireland.

Adnan Khan, Maheen Shahab, Malik Maqsood Anwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adnan KhanGastroenterology, Our Lady's Hospital, Navan, IRL.
Maheen ShahabInternal Medicine, Our Lady's Hospital, Navan, IRL.
Malik Maqsood AnwarGastroenterology, Our Lady's Hospital, Navan, IRL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly those receiving biologic therapies, are at increased risk of infections due to immunosuppression. Vaccinations play a vital role in reducing this risk, yet adherence to immunisation schedules remains suboptimal. This audit aimed to assess vaccination coverage among IBD patients on biologic therapies at Our Lady's Hospital, Navan, Ireland, and to identify areas for improvement. Aim and objectives The primary aim was to evaluate adherence to recommended immunisation schedules for IBD patients on biologics. Specific objectives were to assess uptake of vaccines including tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap), meningococcal, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza, herpes zoster, human papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV), to identify gaps in coverage, and to propose interventions to improve adherence. Methods A retrospective review of 24 patients with IBD receiving regular biologic infusions at the hospital's day ward was conducted. Data collected included demographics, type of IBD, biologic therapy details, and vaccination status. The assessment was based on the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO)-aligned immunisation recommendations. Immunity to VZV was accepted based on documented infection history or serological confirmation. Results Among the 24 patients reviewed, 14 had ulcerative colitis and 10 had Crohn's disease. Sixteen were male and eight female. Twenty patients were on infliximab and four on vedolizumab. Vaccination coverage was generally low: Tdap (5/11, 45.5%), meningococcal (1/4, 25%), MMR (1/2, 50%), SARS-CoV-2 (0/4, 0%), influenza (1/10, 10%), HPV (1/3 eligible females, 33.3%), HBV (2/15, 13.3%), and HAV (0/4, 0%). All six patients with VZV data showed immunity. No documentation was available for herpes zoster vaccination. Conclusion The audit revealed significant gaps in adherence to vaccination guidelines among IBD patients receiving biologics. These findings highlight the need for systematic interventions to improve vaccine uptake, such as routine immunisation status reviews during clinic visits, improved documentation practices, patient education on vaccine safety and necessity, and stronger collaboration between gastroenterologists and primary care providers. Educational materials should be provided during clinic or infusion appointments to address vaccine hesitancy and misinformation. Implementing these changes could reduce the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

biologic treatmentimproving ibd patient vaccinationinflammatory bowel disease (ibd)vaccination policyvaccine preventable diseases

Identifiers

PMID41835040
PMCPMC12981608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.