ArticleHRB open research2025
Training and Experience in Study Selection (TESS): study protocol for a pilot randomised trial within a systematic review.
Article in HRB open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training and Experience in Study Selection (TESS): study protocol for a pilot randomised trial within a systematic review.HRB open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Systematic reviews can be resource-intensive and require timely completion, yet experienced reviewers may have limited availability, necessitating the inclusion of novice screeners. This Study Within A Review (SWAR) will pilot and examine the feasibility of study methods to explore whether training and level of experience within the screening pair affects the reliability of decisions made by novice screeners during study selection. Methods: A 2(training: task-specific, minimal guidance) x 2(experience level of screening partner, 'Reviewer 1': moderate experience, minimal experience) pilot randomised trial will be conducted within a host systematic review in the topic area of depression and psychosocial functioning. Participants ( Conclusions: Findings will be used to inform the design of subsequent trial work to determine the efficacy of training and screener pairing for study selection. Ultimately, these insights will help to build capacity among novice screeners to engage with evidence synthesis and work alongside experienced review teams. Registration Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAR Registry: SWAR 38.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.