ArticleEXCLI journal2026
Comparison of LDH activity and LDH-M to predict death in patients with acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure.
Article in EXCLI journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation is often the only life-saving intervention in acute liver failure (ALF), so it is critical to identify all ALF patients who need a transplant to survive. However, transplantable organs are scarce and recipients face significant life-threatening risks, so it is also important to avoid transplantation when possible. Thus, prognostics that can predict death in ALF with both high sensitivity and specificity are needed. We previously demonstrated total lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity may be useful for this purpose. However, LDH is a tetramer of LDH-M and LDH-H, and proteomics indicated only the liver enzyme - LDH-M - increases in non-survivors. LDH-H decreased. Because total LDH comprises both, it is possible that LDH-M could have even better prognostic performance. To test that, we compared total LDH and LDH-M in a subset of samples from our prior study of survivors and non-survivors of acetaminophen (APAP)-induced ALF. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and the MELD-LDH score were also calculated. Both total LDH and LDH-M values were greater in non-survivors than survivors, but there was no significant difference in prognostic metrics between them. Overall, total LDH performed similarly to or modestly better than both LDH-M and the MELD. The MELD-LDH score also performed somewhat better than the MELD. See also the graphical abstract(Fig. 1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.