Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41834907›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Neurorehabilitation needs a qualitative perspective: a case exemplar from stroke recovery and rehabilitation.

Marika Demers, Carolee J Winstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marika DemersInstitut Universitaire sur la Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Carolee J WinsteinDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, and Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurorehabilitation is a medical process using neuroplasticity to help people recover from nervous system damage (like stroke, injury or disease) by improving function, independence, and quality of life through therapies (physio, occupational, speech) to retrain the brain and learn new ways to perform daily tasks, addressing physical, cognitive, and emotional needs. This process is shaped by the dynamic interaction of the person, the environment, and the task. Quantitative methods rooted in the science of experience-dependent plasticity, and rigorous clinical trial designs have produced significant advances, including the development of novel neurotechnologies. However, the comprehensive translation of these advances into meaningful outcomes for people living with a neurological condition requires a broader perspective. Central to this perspective is the recognition that the recovery process, includes motor/physical, sensory/perceptual, cognitive, affective, and psychosocial dimensions. We emphasize the integration of qualitative methods into neurorehabilitation research to provide for better translation and a more comprehensive understanding of the process. This perspective is organized into four thematic sections: foundations/current issues; integration of lived experience to improve research and current practice; recommendations for behavioral interventions; and integration of qualitative methods into clinically less mature topics to reveal mechanisms that quantitative data alone cannot capture.

Indexed as

mixed methodsneurosciencesrecoveryrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID41834907
PMCPMC12979409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.