ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Neurorehabilitation needs a qualitative perspective: a case exemplar from stroke recovery and rehabilitation.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurorehabilitation is a medical process using neuroplasticity to help people recover from nervous system damage (like stroke, injury or disease) by improving function, independence, and quality of life through therapies (physio, occupational, speech) to retrain the brain and learn new ways to perform daily tasks, addressing physical, cognitive, and emotional needs. This process is shaped by the dynamic interaction of the person, the environment, and the task. Quantitative methods rooted in the science of experience-dependent plasticity, and rigorous clinical trial designs have produced significant advances, including the development of novel neurotechnologies. However, the comprehensive translation of these advances into meaningful outcomes for people living with a neurological condition requires a broader perspective. Central to this perspective is the recognition that the recovery process, includes motor/physical, sensory/perceptual, cognitive, affective, and psychosocial dimensions. We emphasize the integration of qualitative methods into neurorehabilitation research to provide for better translation and a more comprehensive understanding of the process. This perspective is organized into four thematic sections: foundations/current issues; integration of lived experience to improve research and current practice; recommendations for behavioral interventions; and integration of qualitative methods into clinically less mature topics to reveal mechanisms that quantitative data alone cannot capture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.