Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41834904›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

The Sequence (S) index as a marker of diminished step-to-step transition efficiency in older adults.

Elham Alijanpour, Ashwini Kulkarni, Peter G Adamczyk, Daniel M Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elham AlijanpourEllmer College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Ashwini KulkarniEllmer College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Peter G AdamczykCollege of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Daniel M RussellEllmer College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Age-related declines in walking efficiency are often attributed to musculoskeletal and neuromuscular changes, yet the mechanisms underlying these inefficiencies remain poorly understood. One key contributor is the step-to-step transition (STST), during which the center of mass (CoM) is redirected between limbs. The Sequence (S) index quantifies the temporal overlap between push-off and collision forces during STST, with higher values indicating greater mechanical energy loss. This study investigated whether aging affects STST efficiency, as quantified by the S index, and examined the timing and impulse characteristics underlying observed differences. Methods: Thirteen young and eleven older healthy adults walked at five speeds relative to their preferred walking speed on an instrumented treadmill while ground reaction force data were collected. Results: Older adults exhibited significantly higher S index values across all speeds, indicating less efficient gait. These differences were accompanied by shorter pre-HC duration, lower total push-off impulse, lower single support push-off impulse, and higher double support collision impulse. Both groups showed reductions in S index at higher speeds, primarily through increased single-support timing and impulses, and decreased double-support overlap, but older adults remained less efficient overall. Discussion: These results suggest that aging impairs the temporal and mechanical coordination of STST. This effect may potentially be due to neuromuscular changes. The S index offers a step-level, mechanically grounded metric for assessing gait efficiency and may provide insight into energetic cost in older populations.

Indexed as

agingenergy lossgait efficiencyground reaction forcesS indexstep-to-step transition

Identifiers

PMID41834904
PMCPMC12979937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.