ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Syndromic Diagnostics for Travelers' Diarrhea: Near-Patient Field-Expedient Testing in Resource-Limited Settings.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Infectious Disease Management in Resource-Limited Settings.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We assessed the diagnostic agreement of BioFire FilmArray multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with Seegene Allplex PCR for testing fecal samples collected during a diarrhea outbreak in resource-limited settings. Methods: Fecal samples from consented British military personnel training in Kenya were collected without preservative and tested onsite with the FilmArray PCR platform. Anonymized corresponding samples frozen near the point of care were tested 16-18 months later in the United Kingdom using Seegene PCR (reference standard). We compared test sensitivity and specificity and assessed agreement using Cohen κ coefficients. Results: Samples were analyzed from 60 individuals (80% male; median age [interquartile range], 24 [22-28] years). The overall pathogen detection rates did not differ significantly between FilmArray and Seegene PCR (55 of 60 [91.7%] vs 53 of 59 [89.8%], respectively [ Conclusions: The study shows moderate concordance of FilmArray with Seegene PCR in the detection of 5 enteropathogens and poor to fair concordance for 7 others, but high-quality case-control studies are needed to assess agreement between these platforms. However, based on performance characteristics, including platform versatility and ease of use, and in the absence of a gold (reference) standard test, the FilmArray platform remains a suitable near-patient field-expedient platform for diarrhea diagnostics in resource-limited settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.