Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41834900›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026

Syndromic Diagnostics for Travelers' Diarrhea: Near-Patient Field-Expedient Testing in Resource-Limited Settings.

Romeo Toriro, Christopher T Williams, Dominic L Wooding, Thomas Edwards, Matthew K O'Shea, Thomas E Fletcher, Nicholas J Beeching, Daniel S Burns, Stephen D Woolley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Romeo ToriroAcademic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham,Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5984-5276
Christopher T WilliamsCentre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Dominic L WoodingCentre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9985-0413
Thomas EdwardsCentre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Matthew K O'SheaAcademic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham,Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-8088
Thomas E FletcherDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Nicholas J BeechingDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7019-8791
Daniel S BurnsAcademic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham,Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Stephen D WoolleyAcademic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham,Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9385-8975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We assessed the diagnostic agreement of BioFire FilmArray multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with Seegene Allplex PCR for testing fecal samples collected during a diarrhea outbreak in resource-limited settings. Methods: Fecal samples from consented British military personnel training in Kenya were collected without preservative and tested onsite with the FilmArray PCR platform. Anonymized corresponding samples frozen near the point of care were tested 16-18 months later in the United Kingdom using Seegene PCR (reference standard). We compared test sensitivity and specificity and assessed agreement using Cohen κ coefficients. Results: Samples were analyzed from 60 individuals (80% male; median age [interquartile range], 24 [22-28] years). The overall pathogen detection rates did not differ significantly between FilmArray and Seegene PCR (55 of 60 [91.7%] vs 53 of 59 [89.8%], respectively [ Conclusions: The study shows moderate concordance of FilmArray with Seegene PCR in the detection of 5 enteropathogens and poor to fair concordance for 7 others, but high-quality case-control studies are needed to assess agreement between these platforms. However, based on performance characteristics, including platform versatility and ease of use, and in the absence of a gold (reference) standard test, the FilmArray platform remains a suitable near-patient field-expedient platform for diarrhea diagnostics in resource-limited settings.

Identifiers

PMID41834900
PMCPMC12980125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.