ArticlePediatric health, medicine and therapeutics2026
Lived Experiences of Vertebral Body Tethering: A Qualitative Study of the Patient Journey.
Article in Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common spinal deformity in children. While posterior spinal fusion is the standard treatment for curves ≥45°, anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) has emerged as an alternative for some patients. This study explores the experiences of patients who underwent VBT, focusing on decision-making, recovery, and long-term concerns. Patients and Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty patients diagnosed with progressive AIS and a spinal deformity less than 60° at the time of surgery. All participants underwent VBT, completed three years of follow-up, and had reached skeletal maturity. Recruited from a single orthopaedic institute and treated by the same physician, participants averaged 18 years of age, 85% were women. Interview transcripts were analyzed using collaborative content analysis. Results: Key decision-making factors included pain, worsening condition, brace use, and concerns about appearance. VBT was preferred over fusion due to perceived benefits such as preserved flexibility, less invasiveness, shorter recovery, and lower risk of infection. Decisions were also influenced by family, physicians, and experiences of others. Recovery experiences were mixed. Some participants described difficult early recovery but felt positive overall; others recalled prolonged pain and physical limitations. Most reported reduced anxiety post-surgery, though concerns about long-term effects and future surgeries remained. Conclusion: This study offers insight into the lived experience of individuals who underwent VBT and underscores the importance of patient-centered care in surgical decision-making and recovery. Findings highlight opportunities to support patients considering VBT versus fusion and the need for comparative effectiveness studies focused on long-term outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.