ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026
Use of the AM-PAC 6 Clicks Basic Mobility Short Forms as a Measure of Functional Change in the Pediatric Heart Failure Population.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the responsiveness of the 6 Clicks Basic Mobility Short Form (BMSF) and Basic Mobility Short Form - Low Function (BMSF-LF) in children with heart failure (HF) and to assess the correlations of the BMSF with the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the 60-Second Sit-to-Stand (60sSTS) test. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Inpatient acute cardiac center in a large, urban children's hospital. Participants: Sixty-six participants (N=66) between 1 and 21 years of age with a diagnosis of pediatric HF and at least 2 documented BMSF and/or BMSF-LF in the electronic medical record. Chart reviews were completed for each participant to determine if change was a result of functional improvement or a change in medical status resulting in functional decline. Data for the 60sSTS and 6MWT were included if completed within 48 hours of a documented BMSF. Thirty participants completed a 60sSTS and 21 participants completed a 6MWT. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: BMSF, BMSF-LF, 6MWT, and 60sSTS. Results: Large effect sizes as measured by standardized response mean (SRM) were found for both the BMSF (SRM=0.96) and BMSF-LF (SRM=1.07) for functional improvement as well as for functional decline with the BMSF (SRM=-1.35) and BMSF-LF (SRM=-1.34). There was a significant, moderate positive correlation between the BMSF and the 6MWT distance (ρ=0.47, Conclusions: The 6 Clicks BMSF and BMSF-LF demonstrate excellent responsiveness to both functional improvement and functional decline in pediatric patients with HF. The moderate correlation between the BMSF and the 6MWT suggests a positive association between performance-based endurance testing and functional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.